So ... next up on my low-light photo agenda was the next church I wanted to go visit and 'shoot up' the interior. St. Stephens Cathedral. I called them up and they said to check in with them when I got there so that when they got calls that someone was taking photos they could say it was me.
I dutifully checked in and asked if I could use a tripod ... no. OK - then on to plan B - 'low-light photography like the pros' - straight out of a book I had read. They gave me a pamphlet so I am MUCH more informed on what I was taking photos of than in St. Johns? James? I already forgot ... So thought I would share (there will be a test later ...)
She mentioned as I walked out that the original, small church with the cutest bell in a 'fake' tower was celebrating its 160 year anniversary ON THIS VERY DAY! May 12th 1850 - it celebrated its first mass. So ... how clever was I? (And yes, Mom, it is your birthday - I am fully intending on calling you tomorrow when it is no longer your birthday here ... but will be your birthday there ...)
So - for I believe the first time ever ... I stole a photo off the web an posted it to my blog:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36670/36670df62f19ef5e3da00da5af46271bcfcdf5b7" alt=""
I was too lazy to cross the street and take a shot with my wide-angle lens - so had to resort to stealing. It is sort of sad that this beautiful set of buildings is surrounded on 3 sides by skyscrapers - but makes it feel sort of scrappy - a survivor of sorts, if you will ...
It is the small one on the right that is celebrating a birthday the same day as my mother (my photos from here on out - only this one from a previous 'photo shoot'):
It is the small one on the right that is celebrating a birthday the same day as my mother (my photos from here on out - only this one from a previous 'photo shoot'):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69f58/69f58997b94c52d80876fa4c86125eea3f4e600e" alt=""
The Shrine of Mary was rather popular and I waited and waited until I was alone - annoyed that the couple in front of me were taking photos and using a flash, I am assuming had not asked - so righteous indignation on my part ...
I wondered what this was so it got me to pull out the pamphlet they gave me (for the first time - bad, bad Lori) and really wished that I had read it on the spot - this is the baptismal font. I know, I know - you can't see it, because it is not in the shot. I was shooting down a hallway that I did not wander down because there were a few people quietly sitting and I did not want to disturb their meditation. Didn't realize this was a 3 dimensional sculpture - just thought it was on the wall. It is depicting water and flows from the small font where babies are baptized to a bigger one for adults to this sculpture - dang - wish I had the entire thing - I think it is rather beautiful (you can see part of the 3 dimensional part - the white in the lower left corner) ....
All in all, I am pleased with my photos. Sort of - they are a bit grainy - but that is understandable at the higher ISO speed - at least I was able to take them!
But that burst method? I did find a few really blurry ones, but now I have 3 or 4 camera raw (HUGE files) and a .jpg file sets and that is a lot of space.
AND I CAN'T DECIDE WHICH ONES TO DELETE ...
1 comment:
Lori,
Oddly, I like the picture of the bare windows (no stained glass) the best. My father is a stone/brick mason and I always have a soft spot for stone and brick architecture. You do them justice. Later A.J
Post a Comment